Do you think this character needs to a starring role again?

Jamesy wrote:

Ah shit knew I would make a spelling error.

I was dissapointed when Albert Wesker died because he was once immortal and seriously they could have thought of a more original idea for his death than rocket launchers.

Agreed that his death was pretty craptastic, but he was never immortal.

Jamesy wrote:

Ah shit knew I would make a spelling error.

I was dissapointed when Albert Wesker died because he was once immortal and seriously they could have thought of a more original idea for his death than rocket launchers.

"Agreed that his death was pretty craptastic, but he was never immortal."

Agreed, he was definately never immortal. And I doubt a good reason for him not to have died would be because, "He is too badass", however popular that choice is...

Well then sue the guys at the Resident Evil wikipedia becasue it says there Albert Weseker is immortal and can never die. Thats why he never aged in between RE1 and RE5.

Spike991 wrote:

Jamesy wrote:

Ah shit knew I would make a spelling error.

I was dissapointed when Albert Wesker died because he was once immortal and seriously they could have thought of a more original idea for his death than rocket launchers.

"Agreed that his death was pretty craptastic, but he was never immortal."

Agreed, he was definately never immortal. And I doubt a good reason for him not to have died would be because, "He is too badass", however popular that choice is...

Being badass...It's the new kevlar. Bitch.

God Jamesy...stop looking at wikipedia! It'll eat your brain!

Jamesy wrote:

Well then sue the guys at the Resident Evil wikipedia becasue it says there Albert Weseker is immortal and can never die. Thats why he never aged in between RE1 and RE5.

Well we can do that too, but why would you even believe something like that, having read it on RE Wiki? That is more unrelaible than AT&T's service...

In my book wiki is one of the most reliabe sites on the net. And I will say it again, Wesker looked identical to how he did in the RE1 Remake in RE5 so he must be immortal because he did not age at all.

Jamesy wrote:

In my book wiki is one of the most reliabe sites on the net. And I will say it again, Wesker looked identical to how he did in the RE1 Remake in RE5 so he must be immortal because he did not age at all.

He doesn't look at all the same, they actually changed his face, look at his lips, facial structure, and the hair, and if possibly, look at his personality changes.

Well my eyes don't decieve me. Certainly compared to Chris Redfield there is not a big change in Wesker. If Resident Evil wiki gave me false information about Wesker then I will eat my laptop.

Jamesy wrote:

In my book wiki is one of the most reliabe sites on the net. And I will say it again, Wesker looked identical to how he did in the RE1 Remake in RE5 so he must be immortal because he did not age at all.

Chris didn't seem to age, and neither did Jill. It's a fricken game and at Wesker's age aging takes longer to notice. He was peaking. Also, how can you say that Wiki is one of the most reliable sites out there when you keep getting false information from it? I thought humans were set apart from other animals because we can learn from our mistakes? Also, go tell an English professor at a reputable college that you used Wikipedia as a source for a paper...you'll get laughed out of the building.

Well wiki sure as hell has helped me out on assigments.

Chris Redfield looked like a completey different person as well

Well Jamesy, I think you are going to finally eat that damn laptop of yours because that is indeed false information. If Wesker was in fact immortal, then why is there a debate about if he is dead or not? Don't go waving that info around other places because everyone will know you don't have a clue.

Hey leave Chris alone......he was perfectly crafted and looks amazing.

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Hey leave Chris alone......he was perfectly crafted and looks amazing.

Yeah I think Jamesy needs to learn the difference between aging and toning. I guess "toning" isn't the best word for what Chris did though...

I know my facts more than some others I don't care to name.

Jamesy wrote:

I know my facts more than some others I don't care to name.

Real men say names.

I think this shows it mostly, although rough 3 second comparision.

Yep just as I figured no difference in aging.

Jamesy wrote:

Yep just as I figured no difference in aging.

You are blind sir! You are blind! He is obviously more gaunt in RE5. A bit more wrinkles...although that can really be due to improved graphics. But he is more gaunt definitely.

There are certainly some differences, and why not look at the other changes, that have nothing to do with anything, like his lips...those are noticably smaller....

And I think Chris looks like he should, with the changes in facial hair, head hair, muscles, etc.

I actually see aging in Wesker...the face has filled out, the are a few more frown lines and lines around his eyes...so yes he has aged and so had Chris....the difference is that Chris aged and still looked hot...Wesker just looked odd.....and just cos Chris got all beefed up which is only natural since we have no idea what he had been doing in the time frame...Wesker however has a total body change and no one ever mentions it...it's like oh my god look at Chris that ain't natural and yet Wesker comes outta the plane looking like some Arnie clone and no one batters an eyelid...WTF.

Well whats weird is that in the Russian invasion of the umbrella lab in 2003 Chris looked identical to how he did in the remake yet in the flasback when we see him fight Wesker in the castle in 2006 with Jill he looks completely different. And this is only within a span of 3 years.

And about Wesker well Excelia defenintly took a shine to him

Jamesy wrote:

Well whats weird is that in the Russian invasion of the umbrella lab in 2003 Chris looked identical to how he did in the remake yet in the flasback when we see him fight Wesker in the castle in 2006 with Jill he looks completely different. And this is only within a span of 3 years.

And about Wesker well Excelia defenintly took a shine to him

It doesn't take too long to get that buff. He just worked his ass off apparently.

Yep if you trained 6 hours a day 365 days a year it wouldn't take long to get to Chris size.

And Excella only took a shine to Wesker because she wanted a slice of his new world...i don't think she actually liked him in that way other than being alongside the power.

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Yep if you trained 6 hours a day 365 days a year it wouldn't take long to get to Chris size.

And Excella only took a shine to Wesker because she wanted a slice of his new world...i don't think she actually liked him in that way other than being alongside the power.

I think there could have actually been something there from her.

Nope on the documents in Resident Evil 5 it says that Excelia had a romantic interest in Wesker when they first met.