Why we wont be seeing an Outbreak File 3 ever

Mass Distraction wrote:

You can be in refusal as much as you want but I cannot stand back on my opinion.

I'm not in refusal, I'm in confident satisfacion about how correct my opinion is.

The fact that it's a new story in Raccoon City is reason enough. And it's not rail shooter.

Then you look at all the ways that it's like Outbreak, I mean this is really a no brainer.

And what are these things you speak of? It has cameos, online and the setting is Raccoon City?

You can view it as one but I won't. Because it's not.

Mass Distraction wrote:

And what are these things you speak of? It has cameos, online and the setting is Raccoon City?

You can view it as one but I won't. Because it's not.

It is, and that's the bottom line.

You still didn't state any prominent things that would make them the same and you don't seem to be eager to even state any so we only have to agree to disagree.

People can make their own conclusions on wether this is the next file or not. I say it absolutely isn't. I made my points and laid them out, that's the best I can do. If you can't respect that then there's nothing I can do.

Mass Distraction wrote:

You still didn't state any prominent things that would make them the same and you don't seem to be eager to even state any so we only have to agree to disagree.

People can make their own conclusions on wether this is the next file or not. I say it absolutely isn't. I made my points and laid them out, that's the best I can do. If you can't respect that then there's nothing I can do.

Now I know for a fact you are wrong. You said "People can make their own conclusions on wether this is the next file or not", but I'm not claiming this is the next file, only that it's similar to what I invisioned File#3 to be like.

Bam!

Now I'll just let you glow in the dark.

Ah, my tiredness. Let me rephrase that: People can make their own conclusions on wether they think this is the next file or not

Besides, back on previous page:

Spike991 wrote:

Though tbh ORC might as well be Outbreak 3, but a different name.

Mass Distraction wrote:

Ah, my tiredness. Let me rephrase that: People can make their own conclusions on wether they think this is the next file or not

You can think like that all you want but it still doesn't make my points null.

That's exactly what it does. Your points are nulled. Nullified!!!

But it's not the next File. That's what I'm saying, it's not the next game in that series, but simplay a game that's like it in oh so many important ways.

So you are saying that all this:

Mass Distraction wrote:

The multiplayer in this one is totally different. Having the same setting and throwbacks at the main series counts for nothing either. It also has two factions as opposed to a group of survivors. The character count is 12, 6 in each team while in both of the Outbreak games there were 8 playable characters. Outbreaks were mostly about survival (hence the use of conventional weapons) but ORC is about destroying or saving the evidence and survivors. In Outbreak each character had their own opening and ending sequences for each chapter but in ORC you only get two sides of the story but have the possibility to manipulate the outcome. There's also the full on action aspect wiht all kinds of weapons while in Outbreak you were lucky to even find a gun.

...doesn't indicate that it's a completely different type of game.


And again, you said this:

Spike991 wrote:

Though tbh ORC might as well be Outbreak 3, but a different name.

Of course it's not the next File but you are saying that it as well could be, which is false. Read my points.

I agree with Spike

@Mass, read my points, they trump yours easy.

Stop getting hung up on the wording, when you know what I mean. Desperately trying to cling on to the wording of that one statement, when what I'm obviously getting at is that it's similar, and is like having a File#3.

I'm pretty sure we had this arguement in another thread about ORC.


Anyway Spike is wrong that is all

Spike991 wrote:

@Mass, read my points, they trump yours easy.

Ok, I'll let that other part go.

Anyway, the only points you have made are the setting, relevance to story and multiplayer. All of those are present in other games too.

It's 2-2

Mass Distraction wrote:

Spike991 wrote:

@Mass, read my points, they trump yours easy.

Ok, I'll let that other part go.

Anyway, the only points you have made are the setting, relevance to story and multiplayer. All of those are present in other games too.

It's 2-2

Those are the only points I need to make, it's concrete!