AM I honestly the only one

let ME explain

resident evil 1
game.. starts as STARS in the arklay because of the t-virus (wesker with schemes)
movie.. starts with alice in the arklay facility (wesker wasn't introduced but i assume he was experimenting with the T in tokyo)

resident evil 2 and 3 (Apocalypse - 2nd movie)
game.. outbreak
movie.. outbreak
(both the game and the movie has the outbreak, jill valentine, and the nemesis in it, but only the game has birkin. in the movie there is isaacs. we can see what has copied and what has not btw. nemesis is not actually a tyrant in the movie, he's just an experiment. The movie doesn't have any other bioweapon experiments but the lickers, but it seems that the lickers were failure because they lack intelligence)

Now in the movie the focus is the project Alice but the game it's about viruses and parasites and stuff. Wesker, not to let anyone confused, exist in both game and movie but the focus is different. In the movie wesker wasn't scheming on ruling the world like in the games..and the reason why wesker suddenly appeared in the movies is that anderson probably had no more ideas and was planning on something big for afterlife, even though it sucks. But it can be assumed that he focuses on empowering himself and with umbrella in the movies.

resident evil extinction (3rd movie)
extinction.. duh
alice starts off explaining the worldwide extinction. And there's no such thing as salazar and plagas here.. but we could see the mutated isaacs, and that is due to his experiment, not the 'G' virus and no birkin..

resident evil afterlife (4th crappy movie)
we see the bigger role of wesker here, but we also see characters like claire, and chris. all of them do not follow what they are doing in the games. the axeman, majini's, and other crap in the moveis are all part of andersons 'big stupid plan' for the movie. Which is obviously copied from RE5, well if i could explain the majini's, it could be that the t has made more mutations over the past years (the same goe with the dogs), and as for the axeman, wesker probably sent him from the arcadia ship (probably an experiment)

that's it, not to confuse slow brains anyone

Wow Ace you hit it right on the nose.

at least i got everything cleared right? i'm actually kinda good in explaining stuff and making random theories

Mcghie wrote:

ace.redfield wrote:

at least i got everything cleared right? i'm actually kinda good in explaining stuff and making random theories

Yeah you done a fine job in explaining things there ace.
Im really bad sometimes at clearning things up, like I know what I'm trying to get across but no one else does lol

thanks. well everyone's good at something, and i know what you're good at that i can't do lol

Mass you are awesome for using that Joker claping his hands.

Worked better than me saying anything.

Mass Distraction wrote:

Worked better than me saying anything.

Agreed 100%

Mcghie wrote:

I just wished we had a GIF of Heath Ledger for use in every situation, would be awesome

Life would be so much better then.

Agreed, it's a shame he died though.

I know right, his role of the Joker was perfect.

I wasn't a fan of Jack as The Joker. Heath realized that if you are going to have live actors, you must know the limits. A real human being would just look stupid acting like the genuine Joker. To me, Jack looked stupid and cheesy doing it. So Heath changed his performance to match the realism and grittiness of the new movies. And he did it flawlessly.

what the HELL WHAT IS THIS WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE WHY AM I SO ITCHY

Speaking of dark humor, I loved Joker's fatality in MK vs DC. It was a really nice touch to give the fatality to Shang Tsung in the newest title

NiteKrawler wrote:

I wasn't a fan of Jack as The Joker. Heath realized that if you are going to have live actors, you must know the limits. A real human being would just look stupid acting like the genuine Joker. To me, Jack looked stupid and cheesy doing it. So Heath changed his performance to match the realism and grittiness of the new movies. And he did it flawlessly.

very true, minus the grungy appearance. And having a little more laughing and joking, from a character called The Joker, wouldnt have hurt either.

Mcghie wrote:

Mass Distraction wrote:

Speaking of dark humor, I loved Joker's fatality in MK vs DC. It was a really nice touch to give the fatality to Shang Tsung in the newest title

Yeah that finisher is beast lol
Although Shang Tsung looks strange when he is laughing with his hands over his mouth and stomping around in a circle lol

The clown thing he turns into is really creepy.

Wesker97 wrote:

ok every one welcome to this topic from your greatest Wesker97,and i'm wanting to know am I honestly the only one the movie doesn't match any of the games they don't have leon every one says they do but I highly disagree.

You are definately not the only one, I have the same opinion...

Wesker97 RE game fans will always feel dissed because of Capcom greenlighting the current RE film franchise which is loosely based on the games as opposed to a movie franchise that honors the grandiose storyline that RE really has.

Truth be told I've always thought a miniseries would be a far better vehicle to tell the RE storylne as it really is than a movie series since they would have to condense the story quite a lot and it deserves to be told to the fullest.