Do You Also Think This ?

Mass Distraction wrote:

Btw. Is "being a dick" more valid option? Because I don't want to call you a dick. Pardon my lack of English vocabulary, can't really think of any other fitting terms here.

There shouldn't be anything about me being or having a dick that should be a suprise to you. Get over it.

No need to jump on the Mercy bandwagon just because your original argument was invalid.

And my name change was only as condescending, as you put it, as Mercy's was. Which I personally didn't find offensive.

Spike Reaver wrote:

No need to jump on the Mercy bandwagon just because your original argument was invalid.

Jumping on the Mercy bandwagon? I was merely pointing out that the dude speaks the truth.

Btw. I have no idea what you mean about my "original argument". All I seem to have posted on this thread is stuff about the original beta, none of which that can be accounted as an argument.

Wow, this thread got serious fast, didn't it? >_> Anyway, yeah the first RE5 trailer looked way cooler.

Mass Distraction wrote:

If you haven't read it already, I suggest you do it now: [link] That's the full story of what RE5 was going to be.

I'd never read any of this, and holy fucking shit, what were Capcom thinking when they scrapped some of this stuff? Yeah, some of it is still a bit out there, but a lot of it sounds really cool! Zombies returning, a new variation of hunter.....the Irving train section sounds like it would be a blast, and the bit with the exploding barrels would have been intense......Barry was in it........ and they ditched all this so that we could play Chris & Sheva's Tag Team Adventure for the whole game?

Wow. Now that I've put it in perspective that's actually made me feel really depressed.

Where's the "RE4 killed this franchise for me" option?

Ghost Leader wrote:

Where's the "RE4 killed this franchise for me" option?

Spike didn't have enough room for it because he was too focused on DC Douglas and Sheva, which I'd be quick to remind him: is old news. Four years old. And he's still ranting about it.

Mercy wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

Where's the "RE4 killed this franchise for me" option?

Spike didn't have enough room for it because he was too focused on DC Douglas and Sheva, which I'd be quick to remind him: is old news. Four years old. And he's still ranting about it.

I'm still ranting about Capcom flushing survival horror down the john and going action shooter, which is also old news. So I know how he feels.

I kinda preferred Wesker as the behind-the-scenes calculative mastermind up to RE4, with his megalomaniac change in Resident Evil 5 being too dramatic (e.g. world change/domination, weapons of mass destruction, stealth bomber, lava, grandeur talk, obvious presence...). There was something realistic to simply someone who orchestrates testing/selling of bioweapons on the black market and only destruction to further such profitable endeavors.

The whole Übermensch business with his nurture? I'd liked to think of him as simply a man who was selfishly ambitious and ruthless....

Ghost Leader wrote:

Where's the "RE4 killed this franchise for me" option?

↑ ↑ ↑

Ghost Leader wrote:

Mercy wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

Where's the "RE4 killed this franchise for me" option?

Spike didn't have enough room for it because he was too focused on DC Douglas and Sheva, which I'd be quick to remind him: is old news. Four years old. And he's still ranting about it.

I'm still ranting about Capcom flushing survival horror down the john and going action shooter, which is also old news. So I know how he feels.

Finally someone who understands.

Limey wrote:

I kinda preferred Wesker as the behind-the-scenes calculative mastermind up to RE4, with his megalomaniac change in Resident Evil 5 being too dramatic (e.g. world change/domination, weapons of mass destruction, stealth bomber, lava, grandeur talk, obvious presence...). There was something realistic to simply someone who orchestrates testing/selling of bioweapons on the black market and only destruction to further such profitable endeavors.

The whole Übermensch business with his nurture? I'd liked to think of him as simply a man who was selfishly ambitious and ruthless....

Limey, now you speakin' my language.

Some people choose not to acknowledge that there was even a change. Which is proposterous because Wesker by RE5 was clearly not the same.

Of course Wesker was out of character. He would have ran after living through the plane crash. He's scared of death, but I don't blame the actor for the director's decision.

Capcom really thought this was it for Resident Evil, that's why they made it so conclusive. Unlike Resident Evil 6 where no one knows what happened, nothing really did happen, and everyone was out of character so much they might as well have been different characters.

Cyberization wrote:

they ditched all this so that we could play Chris & Sheva's Tag Team Adventure for the whole game?

Wow. Now that I've put it in perspective that's actually made me feel really depressed.

I knew I was not the only one who had that bogus game.


Rated R for Extra Retarted.

Mercy wrote:

Of course Wesker was out of character. He would have ran after living through the plane crash. He's scared of death, but I don't blame the actor for the director's decision.

Capcom really thought this was it for Resident Evil, that's why they made it so conclusive. Unlike Resident Evil 6 where no one knows what happened, nothing really did happen, and everyone was out of character so much they might as well have been different characters.

Everyone was out of character in RE6? please explain.

00biohazard wrote:

Mercy wrote:

Of course Wesker was out of character. He would have ran after living through the plane crash. He's scared of death, but I don't blame the actor for the director's decision.

Capcom really thought this was it for Resident Evil, that's why they made it so conclusive. Unlike Resident Evil 6 where no one knows what happened, nothing really did happen, and everyone was out of character so much they might as well have been different characters.

Everyone was out of character in RE6? please explain.

Leon tries to reason with a zombie despite his experience, and Chris gained a new backstory where he commands a squad of warfighters, then loses his men and he became a drunk. Why does Ada care about saving everyone she hardly knows?

Mercy wrote:

Leon tries to reason with a zombie despite his experience

It's not easy to kill someone you know, flesh-eating walker or not. Nothing out of character there.

Ghost Leader wrote:

Mercy wrote:

Leon tries to reason with a zombie despite his experience

It's not easy to kill someone you know, flesh-eating walker or not. Nothing out of character there.

Agree, also when you wake up and remember nothing, look in the mirror and look like a miniature hulk, the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right . . . . And whom did Ada help, xept of Leon???

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right

Wouldn't know. Never had a use for the stuff.

Ghost Leader wrote:

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right

Wouldn't know. Never had a use for the stuff.

Well in reality, when you have such a depression and you dont want to remember anything, just like in Chris' case, he never wanted to "take responsibility", until Piers showed up, u just take as much of booze as possible, simply to soothe the pain, so that never took Chris out of character . . .

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right

Wouldn't know. Never had a use for the stuff.

Well in reality, when you have such a depression and you dont want to remember anything, just like in Chris' case, he never wanted to "take responsibility", until Piers showed up, u just take as much of booze as possible, simply to soothe the pain, so that never took Chris out of character . . .

Believe me, depression is something I'm all too familiar with and booze still never crossed my lips.

Ghost Leader wrote:

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right

Wouldn't know. Never had a use for the stuff.

Well in reality, when you have such a depression and you dont want to remember anything, just like in Chris' case, he never wanted to "take responsibility", until Piers showed up, u just take as much of booze as possible, simply to soothe the pain, so that never took Chris out of character . . .

Believe me, depression is something I'm all too familiar with and booze still never crossed my lips.

Manic Depression ? R u sure? I mean its life and shit hits the fan from time to time, but thats not the kinda depression that one couldn't stand . . .

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

Mercy wrote:

Leon tries to reason with a zombie despite his experience

It's not easy to kill someone you know, flesh-eating walker or not. Nothing out of character there.

Agree, also when you wake up and remember nothing, look in the mirror and look like a miniature hulk, the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right . . . . And whom did Ada help, xept of Leon???

Helena for one. Well technically she was ran into Leon, but she saved Helena. She also saved Jake and Sherry for no reason, just because.

Mercy wrote:

ChrisRedfieldRE156 wrote:

Agree, also when you wake up and remember nothing, look in the mirror and look like a miniature hulk, the booze will be the first thing you'll turn to, aint it right . . . . And whom did Ada help, xept of Leon???

Helena for one. Well technically she was ran into Leon, but she saved Helena. She also saved Jake and Sherry for no reason, just because.

Been a while since I've played that part, but doesn't Ada mention to herself that she owes it to their parents (I'm assuming this means Wesker and Annette respectively) to save them, or something? So she technically does have a reason. Just not a very good one.

Not that that disproves your point, of course. It's still completely out of character for her, based on her previous appearances.

Ok, The wesker in RE5 is my favorite wesker. He just seems badass to me. Sheva of course ruined a lot of the game. I love RE5, not really a huge fan of RE4, but still enjoyed it. RE5 would of never been scary in the first place, considering that no RE game has been scary without using cheap jump scares.

Mercy wrote:

00biohazard wrote:

Mercy wrote:

Of course Wesker was out of character. He would have ran after living through the plane crash. He's scared of death, but I don't blame the actor for the director's decision.

Capcom really thought this was it for Resident Evil, that's why they made it so conclusive. Unlike Resident Evil 6 where no one knows what happened, nothing really did happen, and everyone was out of character so much they might as well have been different characters.

Everyone was out of character in RE6? please explain.

Leon tries to reason with a zombie despite his experience, and Chris gained a new backstory where he commands a squad of warfighters, then loses his men and he became a drunk. Why does Ada care about saving everyone she hardly knows?

Leon's reasoning with a zombie, I get. Idiot move Kennedy. Chris is an operative in the BSAA, he becomes a captain and all of a sudden it's farfetched?he loses his men in the course of the game, what are you unsatisfied with, the fact that it wasn't trailing back from previous games? or that he cared about his comrades? because that is an essential part of Chris's character, and one of the interesting parts of RE6. And Ada is a cruel spy, but ever since RE2 she's been shown to have some morals, and seeing she knows the importance of everyone in the plot, why is it farfetched for her to help them?would you rather her kill them? your reasoning makes absolutley no sense.

Industrial Ridden wrote:

Ok, The wesker in RE5 is my favorite wesker. He just seems badass to me.

Was it the break-dance moves and the slow-motion mid-air barrel rolling to dodge bullets?

Industrial Ridden wrote:

Sheva of course ruined a lot of the game. I love RE5, not really a huge fan of RE4, but still enjoyed it. RE5 would of never been scary in the first place, considering that no RE game has been scary without using cheap jump scares.

Ghost Leader wrote:

It's not easy to kill someone you know, flesh-eating walker or not. Nothing out of character there.

00biohazard wrote:

Chris is an operative in the BSAA, he becomes a captain and all of a sudden it's farfetched?he loses his men in the course of the game, what are you unsatisfied with, the fact that it wasn't trailing back from previous games? or that he cared about his comrades? because that is an essential part of Chris's character, and one of the interesting parts of RE6. And Ada is a cruel spy, but ever since RE2 she's been shown to have some morals, and seeing she knows the importance of everyone in the plot, why is it farfetched for her to help them?would you rather her kill them? your reasoning makes absolutley no sense.

Cyberization wrote:

Been a while since I've played that part, but doesn't Ada mention to herself that she owes it to their parents (I'm assuming this means Wesker and Annette respectively) to save them, or something? So she technically does have a reason. Just not a very good one.

All of this dissproves Mercy's point. He just likes to bash on RE6.

RE6 was awesome.

The gameplay was great, minus too many QTE's. Graphically it looked terrific. It didn't look as good as RE5? Would you like some cheese with that whine Mercy?

I hated some of the boss battles, like stupid retardedly long ones like T-Rex Simmons, but those are only a few bits and pieces.

RE6 gets so much hate, RE6 is the new RE4.

Spike Reaver wrote:

Industrial Ridden wrote:

Ok, The wesker in RE5 is my favorite wesker. He just seems badass to me.

Was it the break-dance moves and the slow-motion mid-air barrel rolling to dodge bullets?

Industrial Ridden wrote:

Sheva of course ruined a lot of the game. I love RE5, not really a huge fan of RE4, but still enjoyed it. RE5 would of never been scary in the first place, considering that no RE game has been scary without using cheap jump scares.

Ghost Leader wrote:

It's not easy to kill someone you know, flesh-eating walker or not. Nothing out of character there.

00biohazard wrote:

Chris is an operative in the BSAA, he becomes a captain and all of a sudden it's farfetched?he loses his men in the course of the game, what are you unsatisfied with, the fact that it wasn't trailing back from previous games? or that he cared about his comrades? because that is an essential part of Chris's character, and one of the interesting parts of RE6. And Ada is a cruel spy, but ever since RE2 she's been shown to have some morals, and seeing she knows the importance of everyone in the plot, why is it farfetched for her to help them?would you rather her kill them? your reasoning makes absolutley no sense.

Cyberization wrote:

Been a while since I've played that part, but doesn't Ada mention to herself that she owes it to their parents (I'm assuming this means Wesker and Annette respectively) to save them, or something? So she technically does have a reason. Just not a very good one.

All of this dissproves Mercy's point. He just likes to bash on RE6.

RE6 was awesome.

The gameplay was great, minus too many QTE's. Graphically it looked terrific. It didn't look as good as RE5? Would you like some cheese with that whine Mercy?

I hated some of the boss battles, like stupid retardedly long ones like T-Rex Simmons, but those are only a few bits and pieces.

RE6 gets so much hate, RE6 is the new RE4.

I agree. People bash re6 way to much. So much, that some "bashers" treat it like "They changed it so it sucks" territory.