Should they remake re2 and re3?

ok guys what do u think? Personally i would love nothing more than to have capcom remake resident evil 2 and 3. I know that the new wii game is supposed to be based close to re2 but i mean a full hard core remake like the Re1 remake for GC.

i would love it but only if they remake it for ps3 and not the wii.

Yeah, a remake for the Wii would be gross. But I'd only want a remake if they could do it as well as the RE1 remake. Also, only if they have an overflow of resources and need something for the crew to work on. Otherwise, I'm for new concepts and original ideas, like RE6 and DMC5.

Only if they do it as a full REmake style remake, and for the real consoles not some Wii crap.

Th Wii is technically not a bad console....it just doesn't have the creators making full use of it...that aside though i'm afraid to say that the Wii will die a sudden death along with the PS3 once Narato is released.

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Th Wii is technically not a bad console....it just doesn't have the creators making full use of it...that aside though i'm afraid to say that the Wii will die a sudden death along with the PS3 once Narato is released.

Ha! Don't make me laugh. Technically speaking, the Wii is just terrible. It is almost completely useless to the normal gaming crowd and only markets well to children, non-gamers, and old people. I think developers have done about all they really can with it. The only thing it has going for itself is the motion sensing gimmick, which really doesn't work too well either. It will look utterly obsolete soon anyway with the PS3's SixthSense and the 360's Natal on the way. RE5's producer even said that the title screen for RE5 wasn't possible on the Wii. Proof. <---Click please.

By Narato do you mean Naruto? The day that something as mundane as Naruto kills off the PS3 is the day that I quit these forums after telling everyone that I wear pink skivvies and dance ballet...with a sparkly sash. The PS3 has so much more going for it than the 360 could ever hope for. Bluray, wireless everything, great exclusives out the ass (Uncharted 2 anyone? No? God of War 3? The Agency? GT5? ect, ect...), web browsing capabilities (Yes, I've responded on here with my PS3 before), the PSN which is equal to Live now and will probably surpass it soon, reliable hardware, the list goes on.

In other words Riot, I disagree.

NiteKrawler wrote:

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Th Wii is technically not a bad console....it just doesn't have the creators making full use of it...that aside though i'm afraid to say that the Wii will die a sudden death along with the PS3 once Narato is released.

Ha! Don't make me laugh. Technically speaking, the Wii is just terrible. It is almost completely useless to the normal gaming crowd and only markets well to children, non-gamers, and old people. I think developers have done about all they really can with it. The only thing it has going for itself is the motion sensing gimmick, which really doesn't work too well either. It will look utterly obsolete soon anyway with the PS3's SixthSense and the 360's Natal on the way. RE5's producer even said that the title screen for RE5 wasn't possible on the Wii. Proof. <---Click please.

With the Wii, the biggest issue i have with it is that its based around a gimmick and marketed at the casual crowd instead of the people who made Nintendo a success in the first place. I can count the number of real games on one hand, the rest is just a bunch of minigames aimed at grandparents, mothers and the obese looking to get fit without doing any real work. So not a Wii fan i'm afraid. The only time i will purchase one is when my Gamecube finally wears out.

Quote :

By Narato do you mean Naruto? The day that something as mundane as Naruto kills off the PS3 is the day that I quit these forums after telling everyone that I wear pink skivvies and dance ballet...with a sparkly sash. The PS3 has so much more going for it than the 360 could ever hope for. Bluray, wireless everything, great exclusives out the ass (Uncharted 2 anyone? No? God of War 3? The Agency? GT5? ect, ect...), web browsing capabilities (Yes, I've responded on here with my PS3 before), the PSN which is equal to Live now and will probably surpass it soon, reliable hardware, the list goes on.

In other words Riot, I disagree.

One game will never win the console war, no matter how good it is. As for the PS3 it may be technically better than the 360 but Sony have squandered their superior technology by pricing the darn thing too high. So instead of buying one good console, people are buying multiple 360's instead.
I myself own a 360, because i couldnt afford a PS3 and i prefer exclusives like Gears of War and Mass Effect to the PS3 exclusives (except for MGS4, which i would gladly kill Bill Gates to get hold of), but even i recognise the PS3 as the better made console.

To get back on topic, a Wii remake of the Resi games couldnt do the games justice. Relying on the Wii-mote to control gameplay wouldnt work, and graphically the 360 and PS3 can produce far, far better results.

Spiderpope wrote:

One game will never win the console war, no matter how good it is. As for the PS3 it may be technically better than the 360 but Sony have squandered their superior technology by pricing the darn thing too high. So instead of buying one good console, people are buying multiple 360's instead.
I myself own a 360, because i couldnt afford a PS3 and i prefer exclusives like Gears of War and Mass Effect to the PS3 exclusives (except for MGS4, which i would gladly kill Bill Gates to get hold of), but even i recognise the PS3 as the better made console.

Considering how much the PS3 takes to make, it's probably priced very reasonably. Sony knows how much the price holds potential consumers back, so they are doing anything they can to get its price down. Economically speaking, they would be horrid businesspeople not to. It's already gone down in price a few times and it is rumored that another drop is on the way. But still, the 360 is more expensive in the long run. Price of the console, Live/year, buying the inevitable cooler, repairing it after the inevitable RRoD. Those last two are maybes but Live does add up. The way I look at it is the cheaper something is, the more expensive it is. But if you like the MS exclusives better then I respect that because that is an actual reason to get the 360. Most 360 owners say they bought it because it is an "American" machine, or that it is cheaper, or that it "OMGPWNSPS3WITHL337HAX!!!" I would like to get my Sony hands on Fable 2 and L4D though. Also, did you know the PS3 is getting Mass Effect 2? And Dead Rising 2. (Both of which make me pretty happy. I was a little without them.)

NiteKrawler wrote:

Spiderpope wrote:

One game will never win the console war, no matter how good it is. As for the PS3 it may be technically better than the 360 but Sony have squandered their superior technology by pricing the darn thing too high. So instead of buying one good console, people are buying multiple 360's instead.
I myself own a 360, because i couldnt afford a PS3 and i prefer exclusives like Gears of War and Mass Effect to the PS3 exclusives (except for MGS4, which i would gladly kill Bill Gates to get hold of), but even i recognise the PS3 as the better made console.

Considering how much the PS3 takes to make, it's probably priced very reasonably. Sony knows how much the price holds potential consumers back, so they are doing anything they can to get its price down. Economically speaking, they would be horrid businesspeople not to. It's already gone down in price a few times and it is rumored that another drop is on the way. But still, the 360 is more expensive in the long run. Price of the console, Live/year, buying the inevitable cooler, repairing it after the inevitable RRoD. Those last two are maybes but Live does add up. The way I look at it is the cheaper something is, the more expensive it is. But if you like the MS exclusives better then I respect that because that is an actual reason to get the 360. Most 360 owners say they bought it because it is an "American" machine, or that it is cheaper, or that it "OMGPWNSPS3WITHL337HAX!!!" I would like to get my Sony hands on Fable 2 and L4D though. Also, did you know the PS3 is getting Mass Effect 2? And Dead Rising 2. (Both of which make me pretty happy. I was a little without them.)

Given im from England, i dont think i will ever say that we should all be buying 360's because they are american . When it comes to the relative costs, replacing the 360 is of course more expensive in the long run, but the average consumer doesnt think about the long run. Given the choice of a £150 console or a £300 console, which largely share the same games, most will go for the cheaper option, even if they have to buy another one a couple of years later.

Oh and Fable 2 is massively overrated, you arent missing much. Mass Effect 2 has been confirmed as not being released on PS3, which is a shame for every PS3 owner since you will be missing out on one the best RPG's ever made. Hopefully it will a limited exclusive deal, so it will be released a year later or something. Everyone should play that game, and the original.

Spiderpope wrote:

Given im from England, i dont think i will ever say that we should all be buying 360's because they are american . When it comes to the relative costs, replacing the 360 is of course more expensive in the long run, but the average consumer doesnt think about the long run. Given the choice of a £150 console or a £300 console, which largely share the same games, most will go for the cheaper option, even if they have to buy another one a couple of years later.

Oh and Fable 2 is massively overrated, you arent missing much. Mass Effect 2 has been confirmed as not being released on PS3, which is a shame for every PS3 owner since you will be missing out on one the best RPG's ever made. Hopefully it will a limited exclusive deal, so it will be released a year later or something. Everyone should play that game, and the original.

R U SRS???!!! Man, last I heard we were getting ME2. I need to catch up on the news a bit. I guess MS figured it was worth paying a bit of dough for huh? Good decision. Do you like Fable 1 or 2 better? I loved the first, but it was just too short. And you are totally right about consumers thinking only about the short run far too often. I always try to think in the long run because as a working class individual, I can't afford to lose in an investment. Unfortunately, us Americans here are pretty bad about it. Why do you think they call us the disposable society? Hopefully we change a bit and take some pages from other nations' books.

Well i happen to think the best fun you can have on a console when drunk is on the Wii so it gets my vote for that...graphics aside it has just this second gone off the market for me upon seeing the remade version of Silent Hill....i now hate the Wii and yes my opinions can change in an instant...it is however still great fun for drunken nights with ya mates.

I don't know why the hell i keep saying Naruto when i mean Natal....for some reason it's stuck in my head. Fable 1 and 2 both suck....relative gameplay is boring...bring back Knights Of The Old Republic...remade or brand new...god i loved them.

The PS3 is hugely OVER RATED....i for one cannot stand Sony, they act like they own the market and there is not one single game out on that console that would ever make me consider buying it. Ok it has BlueRay but hell i can pick up one pf those players over here for £100so to me it offers very little if not nothing for my gaming needs that i cannot get from my trusty 360....can ya tell i'm a Microsoft gal

knights of the old republic, now thats a game we need a new version of, i spent hours on both those games, awesome, as much as i enjoyed fable 2, it was kinda easy

Oh yes the many hours that game could devour off you.....i too spent hours creating my Jedi, loved being able to choose between going to the Jedi side or the Sith side....once in KOTOR 1 i came across a woman who had developed an very unhealthy obsession with her droid so i said i'd go looking for it and when i found it i killed it...well what can i say she was getting a little too over friendly and needed to get into the real world ha ha ha ha.

yeah light side, dark side, using crystals for your saber, force powers, it had everything, i must have wasted a good chunk of life on this game, now doing the same with fallout 3, lol

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Well i happen to think the best fun you can have on a console when drunk is on the Wii so it gets my vote for that...graphics aside it has just this second gone off the market for me upon seeing the remade version of Silent Hill....i now hate the Wii and yes my opinions can change in an instant...it is however still great fun for drunken nights with ya mates.

I don't know why the hell i keep saying Naruto when i mean Natal....for some reason it's stuck in my head. Fable 1 and 2 both suck....relative gameplay is boring...bring back Knights Of The Old Republic...remade or brand new...god i loved them.

The PS3 is hugely OVER RATED....i for one cannot stand Sony, they act like they own the market and there is not one single game out on that console that would ever make me consider buying it. Ok it has BlueRay but hell i can pick up one pf those players over here for £100so to me it offers very little if not nothing for my gaming needs that i cannot get from my trusty 360....can ya tell i'm a Microsoft gal

How is it overrated when seemingly no one likes it? And you just don't like Sony because they took an idea from you because you didn't think to COPYRIGHT!!!! Anyway, Sony definitely doesn't act like it owns the market. Microsoft are the ones that drop a million dollars whenever they see fit, which is always. The only real reason someone should prefer the 360 is if they like the exclusives because the PS3 does everything better. And Natal is nothing compared to Sixense, and both are utterly retarded anyway. And please, never use "trusty" and "360" in the same sentence unless you are talking about how you trust it will red ring any day now.

Mass Effect 2 definitely wont be on the PS3 at launch, its still unknown if it will remain that way forever. Although to get the most out of it they would have to port Mass Effect first. Chances are slim though, because although Microsoft doesnt own the Mass Effect IP, they likely insisted on some exclusivity deal when they agreed to publish it.

As for Natal, it's yet another gimmick aimed at the casual market. The problem with focusing on the casual market is that like their name implies, they are casual consumers. When the next fad comes along the Wii will be dropped like a sack of potatoes and Nintendo's sales will plummet. I dread to think what will happen to the 360 if Natal becomes that fad, do we really want endless clones of carnival games or Cooking Mama 982: Cannibal Mama?

Spiderpope wrote:

Mass Effect 2 definitely wont be on the PS3 at launch, its still unknown if it will remain that way forever. Although to get the most out of it they would have to port Mass Effect first. Chances are slim though, because although Microsoft doesnt own the Mass Effect IP, they likely insisted on some exclusivity deal when they agreed to publish it.

As for Natal, it's yet another gimmick aimed at the casual market. The problem with focusing on the casual market is that like their name implies, they are casual consumers. When the next fad comes along the Wii will be dropped like a sack of potatoes and Nintendo's sales will plummet. I dread to think what will happen to the 360 if Natal becomes that fad, do we really want endless clones of carnival games or Cooking Mama 982: Cannibal Mama?

The Wii is this generation's Furby! Or Tickle Me Elmo! I really hope Sony doesn't waste much on the sixense.

NiteKrawler wrote:

Spiderpope wrote:

Mass Effect 2 definitely wont be on the PS3 at launch, its still unknown if it will remain that way forever. Although to get the most out of it they would have to port Mass Effect first. Chances are slim though, because although Microsoft doesnt own the Mass Effect IP, they likely insisted on some exclusivity deal when they agreed to publish it.

As for Natal, it's yet another gimmick aimed at the casual market. The problem with focusing on the casual market is that like their name implies, they are casual consumers. When the next fad comes along the Wii will be dropped like a sack of potatoes and Nintendo's sales will plummet. I dread to think what will happen to the 360 if Natal becomes that fad, do we really want endless clones of carnival games or Cooking Mama 982: Cannibal Mama?

The Wii is this generation's Furby! Or Tickle Me Elmo! I really hope Sony doesn't waste much on the sixense.

Oh god, I hated Furbies!

lyfesArcanum wrote:

NiteKrawler wrote:

Spiderpope wrote:

Mass Effect 2 definitely wont be on the PS3 at launch, its still unknown if it will remain that way forever. Although to get the most out of it they would have to port Mass Effect first. Chances are slim though, because although Microsoft doesnt own the Mass Effect IP, they likely insisted on some exclusivity deal when they agreed to publish it.

As for Natal, it's yet another gimmick aimed at the casual market. The problem with focusing on the casual market is that like their name implies, they are casual consumers. When the next fad comes along the Wii will be dropped like a sack of potatoes and Nintendo's sales will plummet. I dread to think what will happen to the 360 if Natal becomes that fad, do we really want endless clones of carnival games or Cooking Mama 982: Cannibal Mama?

The Wii is this generation's Furby! Or Tickle Me Elmo! I really hope Sony doesn't waste much on the sixense.

Oh god, I hated Furbies!

I'm embarrassed to say that I thought Furbies could talk to you and everything. I thought they were some kind of crazy awesome A.I. that you could hold conversations with. lol. Boy was I disappointed when I got my Furby...

NiteKrawler wrote:

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Well i happen to think the best fun you can have on a console when drunk is on the Wii so it gets my vote for that...graphics aside it has just this second gone off the market for me upon seeing the remade version of Silent Hill....i now hate the Wii and yes my opinions can change in an instant...it is however still great fun for drunken nights with ya mates.

I don't know why the hell i keep saying Naruto when i mean Natal....for some reason it's stuck in my head. Fable 1 and 2 both suck....relative gameplay is boring...bring back Knights Of The Old Republic...remade or brand new...god i loved them.

The PS3 is hugely OVER RATED....i for one cannot stand Sony, they act like they own the market and there is not one single game out on that console that would ever make me consider buying it. Ok it has BlueRay but hell i can pick up one pf those players over here for £100so to me it offers very little if not nothing for my gaming needs that i cannot get from my trusty 360....can ya tell i'm a Microsoft gal

How is it overrated when seemingly no one likes it? And you just don't like Sony because they took an idea from you because you didn't think to COPYRIGHT!!!! Anyway, Sony definitely doesn't act like it owns the market. Microsoft are the ones that drop a million dollars whenever they see fit, which is always. The only real reason someone should prefer the 360 is if they like the exclusives because the PS3 does everything better. And Natal is nothing compared to Sixense, and both are utterly retarded anyway. And please, never use "trusty" and "360" in the same sentence unless you are talking about how you trust it will red ring any day now.

Ha ha ha ha yes i HATE Sony with vengence....anyhow why buy a console that clearly can't handle it's graphics engine....Metal Gear was a great one for screwing PS3's up....my cousin has one and his dies a death by going bang and smoking when he tried playing Metal Gear in it. Looking at the PS3 graphics engine i don't really see anything different in it at all, it's definately not the smoothest of graphics i have seen in any games. I say trusty because unlike many 360 owners i have taught myself to mend the ring of death...so now whenever it happens to me i can just fix it...i kinda figured it would be good knowledge to hold lol.

Anyhows if i had to pick my all time fave console it would have been the SEGA Dreamcast...beautiful little thing that was and had some gorgeous graphics to boot at the time...and i still own mine with CVX.

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Ha ha ha ha yes i HATE Sony with vengence....anyhow why buy a console that clearly can't handle it's graphics engine....Metal Gear was a great one for screwing PS3's up....my cousin has one and his dies a death by going bang and smoking when he tried playing Metal Gear in it. Looking at the PS3 graphics engine i don't really see anything different in it at all, it's definately not the smoothest of graphics i have seen in any games. I say trusty because unlike many 360 owners i have taught myself to mend the ring of death...so now whenever it happens to me i can just fix it...i kinda figured it would be good knowledge to hold lol.

Anyhows if i had to pick my all time fave console it would have been the SEGA Dreamcast...beautiful little thing that was and had some gorgeous graphics to boot at the time...and i still own mine with CVX.

The PS3 has already proven itself as much more capable than any other console in the graphics department. You obviously haven't played Uncharted, Killzone 2 or even the PSN game called Flower. Obviously, multiplats are going to be the same graphically because developers are lazy. The first party developers are the ones that show what the PS3 can truly do. You know why? It doesn't have the 360 development holding it back. I'm not sure what happened to your cousin's PS3 with MGS4, but I played the demo of it and mine handled it just fine. MGS4 isn't even that good graphically anyway. And about fixing the red ring, you really just have to ask yourself, "Should I really have to fix this?" I have every single thing the 360 has and more in my PS3 without having to worry about unreliable hardware. The only thing I am missing is MS exclusives which don't appeal to me anyway. If you prefer the 360 for it's exclusives, then that is legit. If you prefer it for any other reason, you need your head checked.

P.S. And Uncharted was a first generation game. I can only imagine what they will look like near the end of the PS3's life cycle, which I'm guessing will be much longer than the anticipated 10 years.

Ah Ntie mate we are always not going to see eye to eye over consoles...your a PS3 guy and i'm a 360 woman.....your always gonna prefer your PS3 and i'm always going to prefer my 360....that's what makes the gaming world oh so very different....plus anyhows even though i own a 360 the only games i have on it are RE5 and Hitman BM.....yep you read right 2 games...and why....because i am so unbeliveably picky about the games i play....tried playing Dead Rising the other day and i hated every thing about it....plus the characters rather overly fat leg calfs made it nigh on impossible for me to concentrate

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Ah Ntie mate we are always not going to see eye to eye over consoles...your a PS3 guy and i'm a 360 woman.....your always gonna prefer your PS3 and i'm always going to prefer my 360....that's what makes the gaming world oh so very different....plus anyhows even though i own a 360 the only games i have on it are RE5 and Hitman BM.....yep you read right 2 games...and why....because i am so unbeliveably picky about the games i play....tried playing Dead Rising the other day and i hated every thing about it....plus the characters rather overly fat leg calfs made it nigh on impossible for me to concentrate

lmfao. Fat calves huh? Maybe Dead Rising 2 will be better. I heard over 2,000 zombies on screen at once. I'm very picky about my games as well. I only buy the super big blockbuster games. And don't worry about the console thing, it helps us both out in the end. The more competition each console maker has, the more quality we get. (Minus the Wii of course.)

NiteKrawler wrote:

RedFieldRiot wrote:

Ah Ntie mate we are always not going to see eye to eye over consoles...your a PS3 guy and i'm a 360 woman.....your always gonna prefer your PS3 and i'm always going to prefer my 360....that's what makes the gaming world oh so very different....plus anyhows even though i own a 360 the only games i have on it are RE5 and Hitman BM.....yep you read right 2 games...and why....because i am so unbeliveably picky about the games i play....tried playing Dead Rising the other day and i hated every thing about it....plus the characters rather overly fat leg calfs made it nigh on impossible for me to concentrate

lmfao. Fat calves huh? Maybe Dead Rising 2 will be better. I heard over 2,000 zombies on screen at once. I'm very picky about my games as well. I only buy the super big blockbuster games. And don't worry about the console thing, it helps us both out in the end. The more competition each console maker has, the more quality we get. (Minus the Wii of course.)

Ah believe me these were monster calfs...so big that they were actually larger than the characters own head and that ain't right surely lol. Yep DR2 is reported to have over 2,000 zombies on screen at once but after playing DR1 it wouldn't make me wanna buy it...there's only so much you can take just repetitively killing zombies that look like clones of one another lol. And very true about the consoles....my ideal deam would be to see SEGA come back into the gaming console market after having secretly created the most kick ass console going.

RE3 GameCube Remake would be sweet, I just love the RE1 GameCube remake!