Anybody want to make a new avatar for me?

If so, the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color, both of which are sort of a "trademark" of mine here. Beyond those two requirements, let your creativity flow and surprise me with something awesome.

I'll try something.

Ghost Leader wrote:

the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color

Done. No need to thank me.

Spoiler:

Spike 4:20 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color

Done. No need to thank me.

Spoiler:

That might be a silly joke, but it is the funniest thing you've ever done

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Spike 4:20 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color

Done. No need to thank me.

Spoiler:

That might be a silly joke, but it is the funniest thing you've ever done

Apparently someone didn't find it very funny because my post got a -. Maybe GL was genuinely surprised and embarrassed to see what was in the spoiler box. "Ah yes! A new avatar! I wonder what my ol' buddy Spike made for me!?". *looks at spoiler*. "I am not amused.  ". Or maybe it was just that degenerate vandal.

Spike 4:20 wrote:

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Spike 4:20 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color

Done. No need to thank me.

Spoiler:

That might be a silly joke, but it is the funniest thing you've ever done

Apparently someone didn't find it very funny because my post got a -. Maybe GL was genuinely surprised and embarrassed to see what was in the spoiler. "Ah yes! A new avatar! I wonder what my ol' buddy Spike made for me!?". *looks at spoiler*. "I am not amused.  ". Or maybe it was just that degenerate vandal.

Personally, I did think it was lame, but no, it wasn't me that downvoted it. And cease with the name calling. For a former admin who wants his status back, you're doing a great job of showing how completely unfit for the position you are.

Ghost Leader wrote:

Spike 4:20 wrote:

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Spike 4:20 wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

the only requirements I have are that it must be of blonde Jill in her battlesuit against a background with purple as the primary color

Done. No need to thank me.

Spoiler:

That might be a silly joke, but it is the funniest thing you've ever done

Apparently someone didn't find it very funny because my post got a -. Maybe GL was genuinely surprised and embarrassed to see what was in the spoiler. "Ah yes! A new avatar! I wonder what my ol' buddy Spike made for me!?". *looks at spoiler*. "I am not amused.  ". Or maybe it was just that degenerate vandal.

Personally, I did think it was lame, but no, it wasn't me that downvoted it. And cease with the name calling. For a former admin who wants his status back, you're doing a great job of showing how completely unfit for the position you are.

So many things wrong with this post.

Ghost Leader wrote:

For a former admin who wants his status back, you're doing a great job of showing how completely unfit for the position you are.

Whatever. I never said that I wanted anything back.

Ghost Leader wrote:

And cease with the name calling.

Show me where I called anyone any name? I said that "degenerate vandal", not "that degenerate Vandal". A vandal according to the dictionary van·dal

/ˈvandl/

a person who deliberately destroys or damages public or private property.

If there was a group or pack of ghosts, and one of the ghosts in the group was the leader and I didn't like him, if I said, "I hate that stupid ghost leader" that wouldn't mean I was saying I disliked Ghost Leader from REF but the leader of the group of ghosts. 

Ghost Leader wrote:

For a former admin who wants his status back, you're doing a great job of showing how completely unfit for the position you are.

Spike wrote:

Whatever. I never said that I wanted anything back.

Get use to it.

Ghost Leader wrote:

And cease with the name calling.

Spike wrote:

Show me where I called anyone any name? I said that "degenerate vandal", not "that degenerate Vandal". A vandal according to the dictionary van·dal

/ˈvandl/

a person who deliberately destroys or damages public or private property.

In this conversation, you were the first to mention my name. If you weren't refering to me in your prior post, who were you implying?

Also for the record, I didn't downvote your post, but I find it hilarious that you're getting offended over a downvote.

Vandal wrote:

In this conversation, you were the first to mention my name. If you weren't refering to me in your prior post, who were you implying?

This is an A and C conversation, B gay somewhere else. JK But seriously now, did you even read my previous post? A vandal and the REF user named Vandal aren't one in the same. Can a fella not use the word "vandal" because it happens to be your username? Too damn bad! And obviously the last statement wasn't referring to anyone in specific but was general and even ambiguous.

Vandal wrote:

Also for the record, I didn't downvote your post, but I find it hilarious that you're getting offended over a downvote.

Exaggerate much? I'm not even close to being offended because my wittle post was downvoted. Besides, you got me beat by a few.  

And now, since GL and Vandal each claim they didn't downvote Teh Spike's post...then who could it be...? 

Not Convincing wrote:

And obviously the last statement wasn't referring to anyone in specific but was general and even ambiguous.

Quote :

And now, since GL and Vandal each claim they didn't downvote Teh Spike's post...then who could it be...?

So by your own admission you were referring to me? Your argument committed suicide in the very same post, claiming that you were being ambiguous, but you clearly refered to two memebers who could have possibly downvoted your post.

Quote :

Maybe GL was genuinely surprised and embarrassed to see what was in the spoiler... Or maybe it was just that degenerate vandal.

The word "that" means you were refering to a member of the forums.

Not to be repetitive, but laying down everything that's been considered so I can spell it out for you in case you don't understand:

You had a suspicion of who downvoted your post. You said it was either GL or someone else who you wanted to remain anonymous. You then stated that GL and Vandal claim they didn't downvote your post. Sure, use the word vandal all you like, doesn't automatically refer to me, but you just said it yourself.

As for who downvoted you, maybe people don't like you as much as you'd like to think.

Vandalhead wrote:

So by your own admission you were referring to me? Your argument committed suicide in the very same post, claiming that you were being ambiguous, but you clearly refered to two memebers who could have possibly downvoted your post.

Tedious, very tedious you are. The only thing my post committed was the act whooping your post's ass. Now lemme go ahead and spell this is out in little bitty words so that you can get it through your tiny brain.

Desperate & Confused wrote:

The word "that" means you were refering to a member of the forums.

No shit, Sherlock. Obviously I was referring to someone on these forums because it had to be someone that was on the forums. Duh. Was that your selling point?  

Vandal wrote:

Not to be repetitive, but laying down everything that's been considered so I can spell it out for you in case you don't understand:

Repetitive, yeah, you're like a broken record, you know that.

Vandalhead wrote:

You had a suspicion of who downvoted your post. You said it was either GL or someone else who you wanted to remain anonymous. You then stated that GL and Vandal claim they didn't downvote your post. Sure, use the word vandal all you like, doesn't automatically refer to me, but you just said it yourself.

As for who downvoted you, maybe people don't like you as much as you'd like to think.

Keep trying to dissect my posts all you want. I joked that GL downvoted it, but didn't really suspect, not that it really bothered me anyway. And I mentioned that it might be someone. Because let's face the facts, it had to have been someone. And I didn't reference Vandal at all, until GL mistakenly assumed I meant "Vandal" when I said "vandal".

Uh oh.

Just to inform everyone, Spike has taken a non-optional 7-day vacation from REF courtesy of me and the banhammer.

I wondered what had happened to spike. Why has this happened?

charlieRE2 wrote:

I wondered what had happened to spike. Why has this happened?

He isn't the same as he used to be. He and Vandal got into it over the Nolan Batman films a while back, Spike didn't like Vandal's opinion of them, and he's had a grudging dislike of Vandal and just about anybody else who doesn't agree with his opinions on anything ever since.

Oh dear. How are you?

I'm fine. What about you? Single and want to hook up with me yet?

Ha ha I am good thanks taken still.

Ghost Leader wrote:

charlieRE2 wrote:

I wondered what had happened to spike. Why has this happened?

He isn't the same as he used to be. He and Vandal got into it over the Nolan Batman films a while back, Spike didn't like Vandal's opinion of them, and he's had a grudging dislike of Vandal and just about anybody else who doesn't agree with his opinions on anything ever since.

Really it was the Batman films? Wow. I could have swore it was something else. Huh. Yeah, Spike is off his rocker.

charlieRE2 wrote:

Ha ha I am good thanks taken still.

You'll come around. They always do.  

Vandal wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

charlieRE2 wrote:

I wondered what had happened to spike. Why has this happened?

He isn't the same as he used to be. He and Vandal got into it over the Nolan Batman films a while back, Spike didn't like Vandal's opinion of them, and he's had a grudging dislike of Vandal and just about anybody else who doesn't agree with his opinions on anything ever since.

Really it was the Batman films? Wow. I could have swore it was something else. Huh. Yeah, Spike is off his rocker.

It was right after that that Nite stripped him of his admin powers, yeah.

Why disbelief stripped of his powers. Spike was always amazing on here .

I actually remember him being quite a problem before that actually now you mention it. I think Nite took it away from him because he was acting out. Nite decided that an admin shouldn't be behaving the way he did and that's when he drew the line.

Maybe it's because I criticized Resident Evil 6. I hated that game and he couldn't believe that someone had a different opinion about it than he did.

Spike=Charlie :O :O :O

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Spike=Charlie :O :O :O

... Mind blown.

Confused...