| Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
RingoSparkle Cerberus
Posts : 70 Join date : 2011-08-13
| Subject: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:59 pm | |
| Not sure if this topic's been discussed before ^^ but I've been wondering why did they change the name from Biohazard to Resident Evil for outside Japan releases? I think the name Biohazard sounds better.... |
|
| |
Ghost Leader Admin
Posts : 4809 Join date : 2008-12-20 Age : 40 Location : Rent-free in Peter Anderson's head
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:59 pm | |
| There's a band in the US with a copyright on that name. But if you translate the English "Resident Evil" into Japanese, then back translate the result into English, it translates to "Biohazard". |
|
| |
RingoSparkle Cerberus
Posts : 70 Join date : 2011-08-13
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:52 am | |
| OIC~ thats too bad.. Biohazard sounds way cooler So kinda like Evil Residents = Biohazard in Japanese then? (ok maybe not *facepalm*) |
|
| |
RaviorStygian UBCS
RaviorStygian Posts : 1568 Join date : 2011-01-01 Age : 29 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:55 am | |
| I the title only really fits the first game, since you're a "resident" if an "evil" mansion. |
|
| |
The Knife Umbrella Scientist
wazoo1875 Posts : 573 Join date : 2011-07-01 Age : 30 Location : The Universe
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:03 am | |
| - RaviorStygian wrote:
- I the title only really fits the first game, since you're a "resident" if an "evil" mansion.
RE2: You're trying to escape from the G-Virus infected 'Resident's of a city which have been infected by an 'Evil' Conglomerate. RE3: You're a 'Resident' trying to escape from an 'Evil' city. RE4: You must fight your way through the 'Evil Residents' of an isolated village. RE5: *See RE4* |
|
| |
RaviorStygian UBCS
RaviorStygian Posts : 1568 Join date : 2011-01-01 Age : 29 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:23 am | |
| - The Knife wrote:
- RaviorStygian wrote:
- I the title only really fits the first game, since you're a "resident" if an "evil" mansion.
RE2: You're trying to escape from the G-Virus infected 'Resident's of a city which have been infected by an 'Evil' Conglomerate. RE3: You're a 'Resident' trying to escape from an 'Evil' city. RE4: You must fight your way through the 'Evil Residents' of an isolated village. RE5: *See RE4* Huh . . . |
|
| |
Bub537 Umbrella Scientist
Bub537 Posts : 456 Join date : 2011-08-09 Age : 30 Location : Ohio
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:24 am | |
| - The Knife wrote:
- RaviorStygian wrote:
- I the title only really fits the first game, since you're a "resident" if an "evil" mansion.
RE2: You're trying to escape from the G-Virus infected 'Resident's of a city which have been infected by an 'Evil' Conglomerate.
The citizens of Raccoon City weren't infected with the G-virus they were infected with the T-virus. |
|
| |
RingoSparkle Cerberus
Posts : 70 Join date : 2011-08-13
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:22 pm | |
| ^ lol too many viruses William was infected with the G-virus, and I think that was what Hunk was after. @ The Knife: Thats a good break down of what Resident Evil is about |
|
| |
The Knife Umbrella Scientist
wazoo1875 Posts : 573 Join date : 2011-07-01 Age : 30 Location : The Universe
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:59 pm | |
| - Bub537 wrote:
- The Knife wrote:
- RaviorStygian wrote:
- I the title only really fits the first game, since you're a "resident" if an "evil" mansion.
RE2: You're trying to escape from the G-Virus infected 'Resident's of a city which have been infected by an 'Evil' Conglomerate.
The citizens of Raccoon City weren't infected with the G-virus they were infected with the T-virus. ...They were infected. That's the important thing. |
|
| |
Mass Distraction Admin
MassDistraction Steam : MassDistraction Posts : 13024 Join date : 2009-09-14 Age : 33 Location : Finland
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:26 am | |
| This thing again? I think I remember taking part in this conversation some time ago... Don't remember what the conclusion was, though. |
|
| |
RingoSparkle Cerberus
Posts : 70 Join date : 2011-08-13
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:13 pm | |
| ^ we do have a conclusion, see second post by Ghost Leader |
|
| |
Mass Distraction Admin
MassDistraction Steam : MassDistraction Posts : 13024 Join date : 2009-09-14 Age : 33 Location : Finland
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:38 am | |
| - RingoSparkle wrote:
- ^ we do have a conclusion, see second post by Ghost Leader
I meant a conclusion to the previos conversation I can't seem to find. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? | |
| |
|
| |
| Why Resident Evil and not Biohazard? | |
|