| A question about Wesker, please. | |
|
+6Spike991 RaviorStygian Jill Sandwich NiteKrawler RebelliousQueen Albert Birkin 92 10 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Spike991 User BANNED
Posts : 9885 Join date : 2008-12-08
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Fri May 11, 2012 5:07 pm | |
| Okay guyz, it's Uroboros. |
|
| |
RaviorStygian UBCS
RaviorStygian Posts : 1568 Join date : 2011-01-01 Age : 29 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Fri May 11, 2012 10:05 pm | |
| - Spike991 wrote:
- Okay guyz, it's Uroboros.
And it will be released into the atmosphere: ensuring total-global-saturation . . . |
|
| |
Albert Birkin 92 Cerberus
Posts : 55 Join date : 2012-02-26 Age : 31 Location : Everywhere where I want to go is enough for me.
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Fri May 11, 2012 10:57 pm | |
| - RaviorStygian wrote:
- Spike991 wrote:
- Okay guyz, it's Uroboros.
And it will be released into the atmosphere: ensuring total-global-saturation . . . Seriously, that plan sounded like he stolen it from a James Bond movie. thats was a cliche pretty bad because a man like him could try to reach something else. Besides there is a mistake, if Uroboros are vulnerable to fire, how is that he endure falling into magma at the wnd. that sucks, besides the rockets shouldnt exploded because they hit the magma, they should melted. |
|
| |
NiteKrawler Uroboros
NiteKrawler Posts : 7504 Join date : 2009-03-14 Age : 37
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Fri May 11, 2012 11:20 pm | |
| - Albert Birkin 92 wrote:
- besides the rockets shouldnt exploded because they hit the magma, they should melted.
Nah, that magma was only about waist deep. The rockets would have hit the bottom too quickly to be melted. |
|
| |
RaviorStygian UBCS
RaviorStygian Posts : 1568 Join date : 2011-01-01 Age : 29 Location : New York
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Sat May 12, 2012 9:16 am | |
| RE5 was supposed to be the first major climax in the series. I say go all the way. But what I think is weird is what Nite once told me: if he released that virus worldwide, wouldn't the billions of people that couldn't accept the virus turn into a bunch of giant leechy monsters? Pretty big hole. I think old Wesky was just bored. |
|
| |
Albert Birkin 92 Cerberus
Posts : 55 Join date : 2012-02-26 Age : 31 Location : Everywhere where I want to go is enough for me.
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Sat May 12, 2012 11:25 am | |
| - NiteKrawler wrote:
- Albert Birkin 92 wrote:
- besides the rockets shouldnt exploded because they hit the magma, they should melted.
Nah, that magma was only about waist deep. The rockets would have hit the bottom too quickly to be melted.
Yeah, but I mean, is not about how deep it was, is just that nothing and no one can resist a fall into magma. Not even the T-1000 and the T-850 in Terminator 2 that were machines from the future can handle it, so less a biologycal organism. i know that is just a game, but I really hope he be dead, because if falling into magma doesn't kill him, then nothing in this earth will kill him. |
|
| |
NiteKrawler Uroboros
NiteKrawler Posts : 7504 Join date : 2009-03-14 Age : 37
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Sat May 12, 2012 1:09 pm | |
| He is dead. Capcom officially stated that he was not coming back. |
|
| |
Albert Birkin 92 Cerberus
Posts : 55 Join date : 2012-02-26 Age : 31 Location : Everywhere where I want to go is enough for me.
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Sat May 12, 2012 1:16 pm | |
| - NiteKrawler wrote:
- He is dead. Capcom officially stated that he was not coming back.
That's good. It would be awesome that Chris and Wesker died together. |
|
| |
DeadlyGenetics Crimson Head
Posts : 647 Join date : 2012-02-08 Age : 33 Location : Out of Earshot
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. Mon May 14, 2012 9:01 am | |
| - Mass Distraction wrote:
- Yes, yes. You were correct. Albert was #13 and Alex was #12.
I still couldn't find anything indicating that Alex was the father of the program, which I'm rather sure he isn't. Ok perhaps that little tid bit of info might have been wrong as an argument ensued over it and the creator removed certain sections of his 'research' because of it. And I have found more info on Alex being #12 rather than the Founder of the Wesker Child Project so he must not have been. Kinda funny how both his name and Albert's start with A's. And I kinda find it funny how there was an Alexander Ashford and now there is an Alex Wesker. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: A question about Wesker, please. | |
| |
|
| |
| A question about Wesker, please. | |
|