What did you think of Wentworth Miller as Chris?assuming you watched afterlife..

...Ha? I don't really get how that is funny.

How's this guy for Chris Redfield?

Ignore that the guy's eyebrows are not as
serious as Chris's. But if they were. BAMM.

So you think Chris is a homosexual? Or?

I so badly want to post a picture of Wesker x Chris

Don't make me Nite.

Also, come on. Whaddya think??

Methsia wrote:

I so badly want to post a picture of Wesker x Chris

Don't make me Nite.

Also, come on. Whaddya think??

Please lets not let this descend into an argument about who does and doesnt look like chris. Sienna didnt look like jill at all, so lets just not take that road. And please dont post gay wesker and chris pics. Please.

00biohazard wrote:

What did you think of Wentworth in the role of Chris?Yknow, I might be one of the few who actually liked his performance. I didnt imagine bulked up, veteran Chris Redfield, but the 1998 version of Chris. His hair was shorter and he definantley looked less battle hardened. I think Miller looks like Chris from REmake. Anyway, he did the best he could with the crappy script, and I really enjoyed the brief fight with Wesker. They couldve given him such a great role in the next movie, making umbrella kidnap Claire or something, but no, they just messed it up. Anyway, your thoughts? horrible?good? meh? why?

I didn't think he was horrible as Chris. He had a sense of humor which is more than I can say for the in game character. But, I was confused. Who was he portraying? BSAA? or STARS? or did the director not care and decided to throw him in something? I don't know. Its too bad he won't be in the next movie though. I would've loved to see a Chris and Jill moment if there was going to be any :3. I had to laugh a little bit when they copied the Wesker fight scene from RE5, but I think that was because I played the game too much at the time lol!

Lady Yuna wrote:

00biohazard wrote:

What did you think of Wentworth in the role of Chris?Yknow, I might be one of the few who actually liked his performance. I didnt imagine bulked up, veteran Chris Redfield, but the 1998 version of Chris. His hair was shorter and he definantley looked less battle hardened. I think Miller looks like Chris from REmake. Anyway, he did the best he could with the crappy script, and I really enjoyed the brief fight with Wesker. They couldve given him such a great role in the next movie, making umbrella kidnap Claire or something, but no, they just messed it up. Anyway, your thoughts? horrible?good? meh? why?

I didn't think he was horrible as Chris. He had a sense of humor which is more than I can say for the in game character. But, I was confused. Who was he portraying? BSAA? or STARS? or did the director not care and decided to throw him in something? I don't know. Its too bad he won't be in the next movie though. I would've loved to see a Chris and Jill moment if there was going to be any :3. I had to laugh a little bit when they copied the Wesker fight scene from RE5, but I think that was because I played the game too much at the time lol!

Andersons Chris wasnt canon to the games, nor are any characters in the movies. Chris was just part of a military unit, he was just a soldier.

[quote="00biohazard"]

Methsia wrote:

And please dont post gay wesker and chris pics. Please.

to each their own?

I wasn't going to. MWAHA

[quote="Spike991"]

00biohazard wrote:

Methsia wrote:

And please dont post gay wesker and chris pics. Please.

to each their own?

Gross.

I know

I browse through DeviantArt to look for legitimate pictures
of Chris. Or Wesker. Then something yaoi comes up.

{=P

Spike. Sort your quotes out.

Methsia wrote:

I know :P

I browse through DeviantArt to look for legitimate pictures
of Chris. Or Wesker. Then something yaoi comes up.

{=P

Spike. Sort your quotes out.

Not only that, also when you search Leon and Chris they had photos fucking each other. Wtf.

Miss Claire Redfield wrote:

Methsia wrote:

I know

I browse through DeviantArt to look for legitimate pictures
of Chris. Or Wesker. Then something yaoi comes up.

{=P

Spike. Sort your quotes out.

Not only that, also when you search Leon and Chris they had photos fucking each other. Wtf.

Oh God, Why?

I dont know why they do that

13 year old little otaku girls and their weird gay cartoon porn fetishes. They ruin it for the rest of us.

I liked both movieverse Redfields.

I like that word. Movieverse. I'm going to start using that now, Anderson-land seems too... I dunno, Tim Burton-ish

I guess he combined movie and version, but referring to it as movie universe is cool

PunkMaister wrote:

I liked both movieverse Redfields.

So did I they seemed to have fitting personalities and looks for the context of the movieverse (im pimping that word out too). I really was hoping for the redfields to be the next movies protagonists alongside Alice (since theyre not getting rid of her) but alas, Anderson decided to put 3 other game characters in one movie and just say ´oh umbrella kidnapped the redfields´. Lame.

PAULSAMSON wrote:

I guess he combined movie and version, but referring to it as movie universe is cool

actually verse is as in universe I call it movieverse because it's obvious to a 2 year old that the games and movies are in alternate distinct universes just like the Amazing Spiderman and the Spectacular Spiderman are in different universes as well.

00biohazard wrote:

PunkMaister wrote:

I liked both movieverse Redfields.

So did I they seemed to have fitting personalities and looks for the context of the movieverse (im pimping that word out too). I really was hoping for the redfields to be the next movies protagonists alongside Alice (since theyre not getting rid of her) but alas, Anderson decided to put 3 other game characters in one movie and just say ´oh umbrella kidnapped the redfields´. Lame.

I think the reason behind them not appearing is that Capcom did not greenlight the characters this time around although this time they have allowed far more of the RE characters than ever before i mean in the previous films we had been limited to 2 RE characters top per movie in Apocalypse we had Jill and Nemesis, in Extinction we had Carlos and Claire and in Afterlife we got the Redfields together. In Retribution we get Leon, Jill, Ada Wong and Barry!

PunkMaister wrote:

PAULSAMSON wrote:

I guess he combined movie and version, but referring to it as movie universe is cool

actually verse is as in universe I call it movieverse because it's obvious to a 2 year old that the games and movies are in alternate distinct universes just like the Amazing Spiderman and the Spectacular Spiderman are in different universes as well.

00biohazard wrote:

PunkMaister wrote:

I liked both movieverse Redfields.

So did I they seemed to have fitting personalities and looks for the context of the movieverse (im pimping that word out too). I really was hoping for the redfields to be the next movies protagonists alongside Alice (since theyre not getting rid of her) but alas, Anderson decided to put 3 other game characters in one movie and just say ´oh umbrella kidnapped the redfields´. Lame.

I think the reason behind them not appearing is that Capcom did not greenlight the characters this time around although this time they have allowed far more of the RE characters than ever before i mean in the previous films we had been limited to 2 RE characters top per movie in Apocalypse we had Jill and Nemesis, in Extinction we had Carlos and Claire and in Afterlife we got the Redfields together. In Retribution we get Leon, Jill, Ada Wong and Barry!

I dont think that two character a movie applies, Jill, Carlos, and nemesis are in apocalypse, Claire, Carlos, Tyrant and a brief Wesker cameo are in extinction, and in afterlife, Wesker, Chris and Claire. And I dont think capcom has anything to do with it, since Leon, who is in RE6 will appear in the next film. Its just Anderson who included them since Milla said she got Ada and Leon in it because of long tweets with her ´fans´.Horsecrap, in my opinion.

00biohazard wrote:

I dont think that two character a movie applies, Jill, Carlos, and nemesis are in apocalypse, Claire, Carlos, Tyrant and a brief Wesker cameo are in extinction, and in afterlife, Wesker, Chris and Claire. And I dont think capcom has anything to do with it, since Leon, who is in RE6 will appear in the next film. Its just Anderson who included them since Milla said she got Ada and Leon in it because of long tweets with her ´fans´.Horsecrap, in my opinion.

I frankly don't know where you get the idea that Capcom has nothing to do with the live action franchise! Dude if Capcom had not given authorization to Anderson to make the films they would not have been made period or they'd be facing copyright lawsuits. Again Capcom and Sony are always listed in the credits and again they do receive revenue from the films what part of all that is not clear? Seriously?

Did you know that before Anderson Capcom and Sony had chosen George Romero to make the live action film franchise and that when he finished the script they found it so horrendous they ditched him and chose Anderson instead. Anderson was liked better because the movies from the getgo happen in an alternate universe.

PunkMaister wrote:

00biohazard wrote:

I dont think that two character a movie applies, Jill, Carlos, and nemesis are in apocalypse, Claire, Carlos, Tyrant and a brief Wesker cameo are in extinction, and in afterlife, Wesker, Chris and Claire. And I dont think capcom has anything to do with it, since Leon, who is in RE6 will appear in the next film. Its just Anderson who included them since Milla said she got Ada and Leon in it because of long tweets with her ´fans´.Horsecrap, in my opinion.

I frankly don't know where you get the idea that Capcom has nothing to do with the live action franchise! Dude if Capcom had not given authorization to Anderson to make the films they would not have been made period or they'd be facing copyright lawsuits. Again Capcom and Sony are always listed in the credits and again they do receive revenue from the films what part of all that is not clear? Seriously?

Did you know that before Anderson Capcom and Sony had chosen George Romero to make the live action film franchise and that when he finished the script they found it so horrendous they ditched him and chose Anderson instead. Anderson was liked better because the movies from the getgo happen in an alternate universe.

Dude Im not stupid so dont condescend. I know the movies wouldnt even exist without the prior agreement with capcom and sony. I know they make money off of the films. But you said capcom placed restrictions on the characters chris and claire redfield. This is bullshit. All capcom cares about is cashing its check at the end of the day. Thats why character restricitions make no sense, Capcom doesnt give a fuck, and Anderson only keeps throwing more and more characters in the movies because he doesnt know what the hell hes doing.

Anderson logic: Milla Jovovich kicking ass + random VG characters that have almost nothing to do with their game counterparts, put in there to grab the attention of the VG crowd + explosions, blood, CGI, monsters, and oneliners = next RE movie. You just cant defend the unjustifiable bro. People will watch anything as long as there is sex and extreme violence. Throw in zombies and you have the formula to Andersons success. And the only reason I watch the live action movies is because I love RE so much, that I want to watch the live action characters anyway. But afterlife was the last straw. Im watching retribution pirated.

00biohazard wrote:

Dude Im not stupid so dont condescend. I know the movies wouldnt even exist without the prior agreement with capcom and sony. I know they make money off of the films. But you said capcom placed restrictions on the characters chris and claire redfield. This is bullshit. All capcom cares about is cashing its check at the end of the day. Thats why character restricitions make no sense, Capcom doesnt give a fuck, and Anderson only keeps throwing more and more characters in the movies because he doesnt know what the hell hes doing.

Anderson logic: Milla Jovovich kicking ass + random VG characters that have almost nothing to do with their game counterparts, put in there to grab the attention of the VG crowd + explosions, blood, CGI, monsters, and oneliners = next RE movie. You just cant defend the unjustifiable bro. People will watch anything as long as there is sex and extreme violence. Throw in zombies and you have the formula to Andersons success. And the only reason I watch the live action movies is because I love RE so much, that I want to watch the live action characters anyway. But afterlife was the last straw. Im watching retribution pirated.

Actually now that you mention it while there is plenty of gore and violence in the RE films and occasional nudity there has been little to no actual sex of any kind in the films.